Home
V6Power Messageboard
Register
Members List
Calendar
Today's Posts
FAQ
Project Shiner 2
Old 10-23-2008, 04:19 PM   #1
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default Project Shiner 2

Most of you know where this car came from, so there's no denying that this car is definitely going to be a runner. We are going through the car to get it ready for its' first trip to Beech Bend. We got everything tweeked, and started blowing tranny fluid everywhere on a trip down the road. Ended up being the pump seal, so it's out of the car, and getting dropped off in the morning. I'll pick it up tomorrow after work, and get it back in by tomorrow night.(We're getting too good at removing trannies.) It really wasn't worth taking it out and shipping it back to PA eventhough it's brand new. There's not much of the race season left, and I'll be damned if it is going to sit until next year.

It feels much stronger now after adjusting the rockers and the A/F is back to normal......
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2008, 04:26 AM   #2
WindsorStang
Senior Member
 
WindsorStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 1,948
Default

Glad to see you moving out on the car Tom!
__________________
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
WindsorStang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2008, 04:57 AM   #3
matthewneuharth
Senior Member
 
matthewneuharth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: rockvale,tn usa
Posts: 6,797
Send a message via AIM to matthewneuharth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
Most of you know where this car came from, so there's no denying that this car is definitely going to be a runner. We are going through the car to get it ready for its' first trip to Beech Bend. We got everything tweeked, and started blowing tranny fluid everywhere on a trip down the road. Ended up being the pump seal, so it's out of the car, and getting dropped off in the morning. I'll pick it up tomorrow after work, and get it back in by tomorrow night.(We're getting too good at removing trannies.) It really wasn't worth taking it out and shipping it back to PA eventhough it's brand new. There's not much of the race season left, and I'll be damned if it is going to sit until next year.

It feels much stronger now after adjusting the rockers and the A/F is back to normal......
glad to hear that. yea Gary called me about that dang leak.

hurry up its getting cooler out. times should be real good in this weather.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!
First over 500RWHP
First over 600RWHP
95 C4 single port
Turbo Dyno #s 550rwhp and 503rwtq. (pump gas)24psi(track only)
667rwhp and 648rwtq 30psi race gas.

race gas Time - 9.76@139.13mph
1/8th-6.24@113mph
60ft-1.50

N/A-best:60ft-1.69
1/8th mile-8.40@80.57mph
1/4 mile-13.30@98.60mph

dyno#s 226 rwhp@ 4800rpm
284 rwtq@ 4000rpm

Sponsor:
WWW.Delkperformance.com
matthewneuharth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2008, 08:56 PM   #4
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

Tranny is back in. 1:15 minutes from start to finish. We're like a regular pit crew here.......

Beech Bend tomorrow.......
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2008, 09:21 PM   #5
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
Tranny is back in. 1:15 minutes from start to finish. We're like a regular pit crew here.......

Beech Bend tomorrow.......
wow .. thats moving .. congrats ... keep us posted!!
__________________
2000 Ford Roush Custom Vert. TT V6 Auto
POWERED by Redlined Performance Mustangs & TMA Turbo

3.8L motor (v1 TT): 381rwHP/430rwTQ SAE @12.2psi Stock 3.8L motor 12.154 @ 110.65MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3830lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v1 TT ): 521rwHP/570rwTQ SAE @15psi Built 4.2L motor 11.175 @ 126.30MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3915lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v2 TT): 595rwHP/561rwTQ SAE @ 16psi, 10.6 @ 133MPH 1/4 1.798 60ft, @15.4psi
4,046lb Race Weight, 18" BFG DR's.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 08:28 AM   #6
slvr2000stang
Mythical Mustang Owner
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 20,191
Send a message via AIM to slvr2000stang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
Tranny is back in. 1:15 minutes from start to finish. We're like a regular pit crew here.......

Beech Bend tomorrow.......
I knew you guys would make the track today!
__________________
Project Phoenix will rise from the ashes And it will be known as Darth Vader
Thanks to:
David Youghn | Tom @ www.supersixmotorsports.com | Artie @ www.artsperformanceparts.com
George @ www.accufabracing.com
3.8 H/C/I 242 rwhp Custom 4.2 246 rwhp
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 04:15 PM   #7
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

Well, we made the track, and that was about it. Was working on the Daiblosport, and it stop downloading in the middle of the tune install. Error message, then it wouldn't let me go on any further without downloading the stock or mail order performance tune. Of course it's not going to recognize 83# injectors, and 17# of boost, so it was back on the trailer. Damn!!!!!

Gotta mail out the tuner to Delk for a reburn...... Matt, I better get it back by next weekend.......LOL
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 04:17 PM   #8
slvr2000stang
Mythical Mustang Owner
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 20,191
Send a message via AIM to slvr2000stang
Default

Man that sucks.

On another note I hear Jr had a great day.
__________________
Project Phoenix will rise from the ashes And it will be known as Darth Vader
Thanks to:
David Youghn | Tom @ www.supersixmotorsports.com | Artie @ www.artsperformanceparts.com
George @ www.accufabracing.com
3.8 H/C/I 242 rwhp Custom 4.2 246 rwhp
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 04:26 PM   #9
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

Yeah, he was pumped...... I enjoyed watching him anyway.
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 05:33 PM   #10
GT-EATER
Senior Member
 
GT-EATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jackson Mississippi
Posts: 6,778
Send a message via AIM to GT-EATER
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
Well, we made the track, and that was about it. Was working on the Daiblosport, and it stop downloading in the middle of the tune install. Error message, then it wouldn't let me go on any further without downloading the stock or mail order performance tune. Of course it's not going to recognize 83# injectors, and 17# of boost, so it was back on the trailer. Damn!!!!!

Gotta mail out the tuner to Delk for a reburn...... Matt, I better get it back by next weekend.......LOL

You need to go get her tuned , reburning a tune that isn't right isn't the correct way to go
__________________
660 RWHP 583 RWTQSAE (Best dyno)
641 RWHP 603 RWTQ SAE (final Dyno)
11.584@124.58 (old set up)
Sponsored by
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
http://www.v6challenge.com
First and only split port to break the 600 RWHP SAE.
GT-EATER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 06:00 PM   #11
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GT-EATER View Post
You need to go get her tuned , reburning a tune that isn't right isn't the correct way to go
x2 ... get her on the dyno and get her DYNO tune!! and verify everything is
100% have her pull to max RPM on the dyno, data log everything and
be safe than sorry..

man that sucks.. I was under the impression that the car was dyno tune before?
what has change?
__________________
2000 Ford Roush Custom Vert. TT V6 Auto
POWERED by Redlined Performance Mustangs & TMA Turbo

3.8L motor (v1 TT): 381rwHP/430rwTQ SAE @12.2psi Stock 3.8L motor 12.154 @ 110.65MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3830lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v1 TT ): 521rwHP/570rwTQ SAE @15psi Built 4.2L motor 11.175 @ 126.30MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3915lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v2 TT): 595rwHP/561rwTQ SAE @ 16psi, 10.6 @ 133MPH 1/4 1.798 60ft, @15.4psi
4,046lb Race Weight, 18" BFG DR's.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 07:17 PM   #12
itschristorres8
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _J_ View Post
x2 ... get her on the dyno and get her DYNO tune!! and verify everything is
100% have her pull to max RPM on the dyno, data log everything and
be safe than sorry..

man that sucks.. I was under the impression that the car was dyno tune before?
what has change?
if i remember this correctly last time it was tuned with a built G-force and now has a C4 tranny(auto)

so loads and other things have to be set plus all the other great things auto offers


unless that was previously done but ive not heard that yet.
itschristorres8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 08:37 PM   #13
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

hmm the Auto is in.. nice .. what's the dyno numbers with the Auto?
__________________
2000 Ford Roush Custom Vert. TT V6 Auto
POWERED by Redlined Performance Mustangs & TMA Turbo

3.8L motor (v1 TT): 381rwHP/430rwTQ SAE @12.2psi Stock 3.8L motor 12.154 @ 110.65MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3830lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v1 TT ): 521rwHP/570rwTQ SAE @15psi Built 4.2L motor 11.175 @ 126.30MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3915lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v2 TT): 595rwHP/561rwTQ SAE @ 16psi, 10.6 @ 133MPH 1/4 1.798 60ft, @15.4psi
4,046lb Race Weight, 18" BFG DR's.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 04:07 AM   #14
slvr2000stang
Mythical Mustang Owner
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 20,191
Send a message via AIM to slvr2000stang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _J_ View Post
hmm the Auto is in.. nice .. what's the dyno numbers with the Auto?
It has not been on the dyno since the C4 was installed. Tom was the first one to drive it since the install.

The last dyno & current tune was for the G-Force.
__________________
Project Phoenix will rise from the ashes And it will be known as Darth Vader
Thanks to:
David Youghn | Tom @ www.supersixmotorsports.com | Artie @ www.artsperformanceparts.com
George @ www.accufabracing.com
3.8 H/C/I 242 rwhp Custom 4.2 246 rwhp
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 04:56 AM   #15
GT-EATER
Senior Member
 
GT-EATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jackson Mississippi
Posts: 6,778
Send a message via AIM to GT-EATER
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slvr2000stang View Post
It has not been on the dyno since the C4 was installed. Tom was the first one to drive it since the install.

The last dyno & current tune was for the G-Force.

Thats correct , after the performance tune is re-loaded it would only take a couple of pulls to tweak the tune to adjust the fuel tabes and timing .
__________________
660 RWHP 583 RWTQSAE (Best dyno)
641 RWHP 603 RWTQ SAE (final Dyno)
11.584@124.58 (old set up)
Sponsored by
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
http://www.v6challenge.com
First and only split port to break the 600 RWHP SAE.
GT-EATER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 04:59 AM   #16
GT-EATER
Senior Member
 
GT-EATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jackson Mississippi
Posts: 6,778
Send a message via AIM to GT-EATER
Default

Oh and Tom forgot to mention he put her on the scale with a full fuel cell it was 3,000 Lbs
with no driver . It was 3050 in stock configuration .
__________________
660 RWHP 583 RWTQSAE (Best dyno)
641 RWHP 603 RWTQ SAE (final Dyno)
11.584@124.58 (old set up)
Sponsored by
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
http://www.v6challenge.com
First and only split port to break the 600 RWHP SAE.
GT-EATER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 05:00 AM   #17
spoiledv6
Senior Member
 
spoiledv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,290
Default

Yeah, get it on a dyno. I was lean down low and fat up high with just an upper swap.

With a few tweaks on my previous tune, i picked up 10 hp before the pump decided WOW you are making some powa and went to 98-100 DTC!

So just be safe and get it on a roller. I have to take mine back which is a pain but I will do it to be safe.
__________________
Fricke Performance Products
spoiledv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 05:34 AM   #18
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

I agree guys. Just need to get roller time......

I talked to Brent, and he was too busy to fit us in last week. He told me to call him on Tuesday to maybe fit me in, but I have to work all week, so I'm not sure.
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 08:20 AM   #19
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slvr2000stang View Post
It has not been on the dyno since the C4 was installed. Tom was the first one to drive it since the install.

The last dyno & current tune was for the G-Force.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GT-EATER View Post
Thats correct , after the performance tune is re-loaded it would only take a couple of pulls to tweak the tune to adjust the fuel tabes and timing .
ahhh thanks for clearing that up.. Very happy the conversion went well,
then all it needs is just an basic fine tuning, thats the first things I would do
just to be safe and know everything is on the money ..


Quote:
Originally Posted by GT-EATER View Post
Oh and Tom forgot to mention he put her on the scale with a full fuel cell it was 3,000 Lbs
with no driver . It was 3050 in stock configuration .
wow thats sweet!! makes me feel like a fat ass lol :)

With his race weight and power, he should be running mid to low 9's "after" he
learns the car .. get it dialed-in etc..

Congrats again Tom .. you got one sweet setup man!! just do the right thing
take the little time needed to get it 100% .. you'll have her for a very long time there is no rush..
__________________
2000 Ford Roush Custom Vert. TT V6 Auto
POWERED by Redlined Performance Mustangs & TMA Turbo

3.8L motor (v1 TT): 381rwHP/430rwTQ SAE @12.2psi Stock 3.8L motor 12.154 @ 110.65MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3830lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v1 TT ): 521rwHP/570rwTQ SAE @15psi Built 4.2L motor 11.175 @ 126.30MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3915lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v2 TT): 595rwHP/561rwTQ SAE @ 16psi, 10.6 @ 133MPH 1/4 1.798 60ft, @15.4psi
4,046lb Race Weight, 18" BFG DR's.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 08:31 AM   #20
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
I agree guys. Just need to get roller time......

I talked to Brent, and he was too busy to fit us in last week. He told me to call him on Tuesday to maybe fit me in, but I have to work all week, so I'm not sure.
I know that feeling ... but please don't rush it man!! you got the ONLY
split-port turbo setup that’s capable of mid to low 9's !! my fat ass Vert setup
will never see pass 9.8's, 9.7's if I am very lucky!! so I'll never see Matt's times,
and you know I'll love to see the split-port in the mid to low 9’s one day !!
don’t have to be this year and I know its going to take a lot of time to learn
your new setup so .. don’t think right off the bat you’ll see them numbers,
just try and enjoy her as you dialed her in..

IMO would not run her WOT untill its been dyno tune (fine tune that is)
__________________
2000 Ford Roush Custom Vert. TT V6 Auto
POWERED by Redlined Performance Mustangs & TMA Turbo

3.8L motor (v1 TT): 381rwHP/430rwTQ SAE @12.2psi Stock 3.8L motor 12.154 @ 110.65MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3830lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v1 TT ): 521rwHP/570rwTQ SAE @15psi Built 4.2L motor 11.175 @ 126.30MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3915lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v2 TT): 595rwHP/561rwTQ SAE @ 16psi, 10.6 @ 133MPH 1/4 1.798 60ft, @15.4psi
4,046lb Race Weight, 18" BFG DR's.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2008, 10:48 AM   #21
afinley11
Senior Member
 
afinley11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: travelers rest SC
Posts: 4,572
Default

Tom just keep after it, I geuss we will see the time next week end! But always lean towards the safe side!!!
__________________
asfinley

04 stang:

Best 1/4: 13.813 @ 104.35
Best ET: 109.+ (Lot more left in the 1/4, D@MN Traction! )

Old Set Up: 312 RWHP 318 RWTQ
New Set Up: TBD

Project: Utter Carnage <Completed>
Project: Ressurection <Underway>
afinley11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2008, 07:47 AM   #22
matthewneuharth
Senior Member
 
matthewneuharth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: rockvale,tn usa
Posts: 6,797
Send a message via AIM to matthewneuharth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
Gotta mail out the tuner to Delk for a reburn...... Matt, I better get it back by next weekend.......LOL
waiting on you.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!
First over 500RWHP
First over 600RWHP
95 C4 single port
Turbo Dyno #s 550rwhp and 503rwtq. (pump gas)24psi(track only)
667rwhp and 648rwtq 30psi race gas.

race gas Time - 9.76@139.13mph
1/8th-6.24@113mph
60ft-1.50

N/A-best:60ft-1.69
1/8th mile-8.40@80.57mph
1/4 mile-13.30@98.60mph

dyno#s 226 rwhp@ 4800rpm
284 rwtq@ 4000rpm

Sponsor:
WWW.Delkperformance.com
matthewneuharth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 01:24 AM   #23
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

Come to think of it, you could have brought it to my house considering you had to come up this way today anyway.... He-he
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 05:35 AM   #24
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

Well, I wish I had good news for you guys, but I took it to Delk yesterday for a dynotune. Brent took it for a ride down the road to check the A/F and do some datalogging on the Predator. On his second trip, he noticed a noise coming from the motor. It was not present on his first run, so we put it up on the dynolift so see where it is coming from. Well, it appears to be something down low-maybe a bearing.

So guess what? Out with the motor and teardown begins again.
We will be taking out the motor at our shop, and Delk will be fixing whatever is wrong with it. I think that is fair for both parties......
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 07:30 AM   #25
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

OMG!!! are you for real man!!! :( no F*ing way!!
Damm SUCKS!!!! That is crazy .. is that not the new motor
that just got built the other day?

Wish you best of luck man, hope its something easy to fix,
but I know pulling a motor in/out is a PITA :(

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
Well, I wish I had good news for you guys, but I took it to Delk yesterday for a dynotune. Brent took it for a ride down the road to check the A/F and do some datalogging on the Predator. On his second trip, he noticed a noise coming from the motor. It was not present on his first run, so we put it up on the dynolift so see where it is coming from. Well, it appears to be something down low-maybe a bearing.

So guess what? Out with the motor and teardown begins again.
We will be taking out the motor at our shop, and Delk will be fixing whatever is wrong with it. I think that is fair for both parties......
__________________
2000 Ford Roush Custom Vert. TT V6 Auto
POWERED by Redlined Performance Mustangs & TMA Turbo

3.8L motor (v1 TT): 381rwHP/430rwTQ SAE @12.2psi Stock 3.8L motor 12.154 @ 110.65MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3830lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v1 TT ): 521rwHP/570rwTQ SAE @15psi Built 4.2L motor 11.175 @ 126.30MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3915lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v2 TT): 595rwHP/561rwTQ SAE @ 16psi, 10.6 @ 133MPH 1/4 1.798 60ft, @15.4psi
4,046lb Race Weight, 18" BFG DR's.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 11:51 AM   #26
slvr2000stang
Mythical Mustang Owner
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 20,191
Send a message via AIM to slvr2000stang
Default

It's the motor Delk built for Gary earlier this year. Just a few hours of runtime on it.
__________________
Project Phoenix will rise from the ashes And it will be known as Darth Vader
Thanks to:
David Youghn | Tom @ www.supersixmotorsports.com | Artie @ www.artsperformanceparts.com
George @ www.accufabracing.com
3.8 H/C/I 242 rwhp Custom 4.2 246 rwhp
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 01:37 PM   #27
Phil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 3,786
Default

Damn!! Keep us posted on the details. Send it to Texas. My guy can flat build a motor.
__________________
00 Vert, built 4.3L w/4-bolt main caps, ½” head studs, Comp stud RRs, BHJ balancer, MSD-4 spark boost, 71mm TB, GT pumps, wiring upgrade, 8AN fuel line, 80# injectors, PI 3-clutch 2800 stall, built 4R70W, alum shaft w/strap, ProCharger D1, 18 psi, built 8.8, 3.73s, Cobra brakes, 17x9 5-spokes, Tubular K-member w/coilovers, TriLink suspension, MM Panhard, meth injection, GT hydrabrake, AEM wideband, 1 7/8" ceramic headers, 2.75" dual exhaust, highflow cats, 6 pt roll bar, 542 rwhp, 11.723 quarter
Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 04:04 PM   #28
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slvr2000stang View Post
It's the motor Delk built for Gary earlier this year. Just a few hours of runtime on it.
thats crazy why all the issues!!! its a built motor!!! are they not using the
same parts all the built motors are using? or is it some custom parts that just don't work? :(
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 01:59 AM   #29
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _J_ View Post
thats crazy why all the issues!!! its a built motor!!! are they not using the
same parts all the built motors are using? or is it some custom parts that just don't work? :(
It's pretty much the same as everyone's motor. There are some differences, but nothing that we would consider major.
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 02:05 AM   #30
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
Damn!! Keep us posted on the details. Send it to Texas. My guy can flat build a motor.
We have Gearhead right next door to us, that has been building motors and racing for 30 years. He can put together one like no other, but we need to have Delk do it because they built it. There may be machine shop work along with parts that needs to be purchased and that's not doable for me right now considering I sold my left nut for the car. I trust Delk can do it and find out where these failures are coming from.
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 04:21 AM   #31
WindsorStang
Senior Member
 
WindsorStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 1,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
Well, I wish I had good news for you guys, but I took it to Delk yesterday for a dynotune. Brent took it for a ride down the road to check the A/F and do some datalogging on the Predator. On his second trip, he noticed a noise coming from the motor. It was not present on his first run, so we put it up on the dynolift so see where it is coming from. Well, it appears to be something down low-maybe a bearing.

So guess what? Out with the motor and teardown begins again.
We will be taking out the motor at our shop, and Delk will be fixing whatever is wrong with it. I think that is fair for both parties......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
We have Gearhead right next door to us, that has been building motors and racing for 30 years. He can put together one like no other, but we need to have Delk do it because they built it. There may be machine shop work along with parts that needs to be purchased and that's not doable for me right now considering I sold my left nut for the car. I trust Delk can do it and find out where these failures are coming from.
Not good Tom. SOrry to hear about you having issues with the car. It seems to be that that is the way these things go most of the time though. At the power/performance levels you are at with the car right now, things like this are going to be more common.
__________________
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
WindsorStang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 05:38 AM   #32
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WindsorStang View Post
Not good Tom. SOrry to hear about you having issues with the car. It seems to be that that is the way these things go most of the time though. At the power/performance levels you are at with the car right now, things like this are going to be more common.
I don't know man .. that motor has not been running that long and head for all the failures.. got to be
something else or defective parts or something, I got local friends with ssm motor running hard from 2005
and still running strong, my rpm motor been install from 2006 and running hard from 2007 .. this motor seen
more long and hard WOT runs at crazy speeds that no normal people will ever do, or should do .. and if we
have same or similar parts he should be running just as strong .. so I would not say its the current power
levels is the issue .. he is still within 600-650 range .. like myself and Matt..

and Matt has the same motor running for years no? only thing he did was upgrade the heads after some
issue but the shortblock is still the same untouched no?

its important for me to know so .. I'll know what to expect .. should I start taking it easy? cause come
next year I plan to run even harder!!
__________________
2000 Ford Roush Custom Vert. TT V6 Auto
POWERED by Redlined Performance Mustangs & TMA Turbo

3.8L motor (v1 TT): 381rwHP/430rwTQ SAE @12.2psi Stock 3.8L motor 12.154 @ 110.65MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3830lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v1 TT ): 521rwHP/570rwTQ SAE @15psi Built 4.2L motor 11.175 @ 126.30MPH 1/4
on 18" DR's with 3915lb Race Weight.

4.3L v6 motor (v2 TT): 595rwHP/561rwTQ SAE @ 16psi, 10.6 @ 133MPH 1/4 1.798 60ft, @15.4psi
4,046lb Race Weight, 18" BFG DR's.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 07:59 AM   #33
matthewneuharth
Senior Member
 
matthewneuharth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: rockvale,tn usa
Posts: 6,797
Send a message via AIM to matthewneuharth
Default

well as tom said something is makeing noise.

this engine has SSM Pistons and SSM Rods.

all Delk did was assemble it and go.

we will see what happened when we get it back.

and yes J i have beat the Heck out of mine for yrs. i put in new bearings and rings this yr cause of a lifter breaking and killing the cam. thats all i have had to do to it.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!
First over 500RWHP
First over 600RWHP
95 C4 single port
Turbo Dyno #s 550rwhp and 503rwtq. (pump gas)24psi(track only)
667rwhp and 648rwtq 30psi race gas.

race gas Time - 9.76@139.13mph
1/8th-6.24@113mph
60ft-1.50

N/A-best:60ft-1.69
1/8th mile-8.40@80.57mph
1/4 mile-13.30@98.60mph

dyno#s 226 rwhp@ 4800rpm
284 rwtq@ 4000rpm

Sponsor:
WWW.Delkperformance.com
matthewneuharth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 08:47 AM   #34
Phil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 3,786
Default

IMHO, that motor is not oiling correctly or the tolerances are not right. Have the main caps been line honed? Are you running the H-series main and rod bearings? Is there sufficient clearance on the main cap girdle with the corners of the main caps? Was the deck of the motor checked or shaved? Using a plastique gauge, what is the clearance on the rod bearings and the main bearings? Were the rod bearings chamfored to match the crank?

IMHO, you just cannot slap together a motor designed for 190HP and force it to 800HP without building in some very tight precision and some serious oiling ability.
__________________
00 Vert, built 4.3L w/4-bolt main caps, ½” head studs, Comp stud RRs, BHJ balancer, MSD-4 spark boost, 71mm TB, GT pumps, wiring upgrade, 8AN fuel line, 80# injectors, PI 3-clutch 2800 stall, built 4R70W, alum shaft w/strap, ProCharger D1, 18 psi, built 8.8, 3.73s, Cobra brakes, 17x9 5-spokes, Tubular K-member w/coilovers, TriLink suspension, MM Panhard, meth injection, GT hydrabrake, AEM wideband, 1 7/8" ceramic headers, 2.75" dual exhaust, highflow cats, 6 pt roll bar, 542 rwhp, 11.723 quarter
Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 09:09 AM   #35
WindsorStang
Senior Member
 
WindsorStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 1,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _J_ View Post
I don't know man .. that motor has not been running that long and head for all the failures.. got to be
something else or defective parts or something, I got local friends with ssm motor running hard from 2005
and still running strong, my rpm motor been install from 2006 and running hard from 2007 .. this motor seen
more long and hard WOT runs at crazy speeds that no normal people will ever do, or should do .. and if we
have same or similar parts he should be running just as strong .. so I would not say its the current power
levels is the issue .. he is still within 600-650 range .. like myself and Matt..

and Matt has the same motor running for years no? only thing he did was upgrade the heads after some
issue but the shortblock is still the same untouched no?

its important for me to know so .. I'll know what to expect .. should I start taking it easy? cause come
next year I plan to run even harder!!
You're absolutely right for wanting to know what to expect...however; I'm not saying the power level should be "expected" to create these kinds of conditions. I'm simply saying that at these performance levels, you should at least be prepared for things to possibly go wrong, not that they inherently should. Sorry for the confusion!


Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewneuharth View Post
well as tom said something is makeing noise.

this engine has SSM Pistons and SSM Rods.

all Delk did was assemble it and go.

we will see what happened when we get it back.

and yes J i have beat the Heck out of mine for yrs. i put in new bearings and rings this yr cause of a lifter breaking and killing the cam. thats all i have had to do to it.
Am I correct in reading into your statement that the rods and pistons are (or you believe could be) the casue of the failure?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
IMHO, that motor is not oiling correctly or the tolerances are not right. Have the main caps been line honed? Are you running the H-series main and rod bearings? Is there sufficient clearance on the main cap girdle with the corners of the main caps? Was the deck of the motor checked or shaved? Using a plastique gauge, what is the clearance on the rod bearings and the main bearings? Were the rod bearings chamfored to match the crank?

IMHO, you just cannot slap together a motor designed for 190HP and force it to 800HP without building in some very tight precision and some serious oiling ability.
These are along the lines of the questions I would be posing. Simply throwing some pistons and rods and a girlde in a block doesn't constitute a built engine. Tolerences/clearances can make or break an engine, especially at the performance levels expected to be achieved by a powerplant like this.
__________________
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
WindsorStang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 10:14 AM   #36
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WindsorStang View Post
You're absolutely right for wanting to know what to expect...however; I'm not saying the power level should be "expected" to create these kinds of conditions. I'm simply saying that at these performance levels, you should at least be prepared for things to possibly go wrong, not that they inherently should. Sorry for the confusion!


These are along the lines of the questions I would be posing. Simply throwing some pistons and rods and a girlde in a block doesn't constitute a built engine. Tolerences/clearances can make or break an engine, especially at the performance levels expected to be achieved by a powerplant like this.

ahhh I hear ya .. and well said...

Last edited by _J_ : 11-03-2008 at 10:30 AM.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 10:20 AM   #37
slvr2000stang
Mythical Mustang Owner
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 20,191
Send a message via AIM to slvr2000stang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WindsorStang View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewneuharth View Post
this engine has SSM Pistons and SSM Rods.
All Delk did was assemble it and go.
Am I correct in reading into your statement that the rods and pistons are (or you believe could be) the casue of the failure?
I would venture to guess Matt is just stating that those parts were not supplied by them, not that they were the cause.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WindsorStang View Post

Simply throwing some pistons and rods and a girlde in a block doesn't constitute a built engine. Tolerences/clearances can make or break an engine, especially at the performance levels expected to be achieved by a powerplant like this.
Buying the right parts is only part of the equation, being built properly is just as critical.

Anyone can assemble a motor but it takes talent & knowledge to "Build" one.
__________________
Project Phoenix will rise from the ashes And it will be known as Darth Vader
Thanks to:
David Youghn | Tom @ www.supersixmotorsports.com | Artie @ www.artsperformanceparts.com
George @ www.accufabracing.com
3.8 H/C/I 242 rwhp Custom 4.2 246 rwhp
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 10:54 AM   #38
WindsorStang
Senior Member
 
WindsorStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 1,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slvr2000stang View Post
I would venture to guess Matt is just stating that those parts were not supplied by them, not that they were the cause.



Buying the right parts is only part of the equation, being built properly is just as critical.

Anyone can assemble a motor but it takes talent & knowledge to "Build" one.
Thats what I figured. I just wanted it to be clear.

You are correct sir!
__________________
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
WindsorStang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 12:07 PM   #39
matthewneuharth
Senior Member
 
matthewneuharth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: rockvale,tn usa
Posts: 6,797
Send a message via AIM to matthewneuharth
Default

if there was any confusion. i am sorry. i was just answering Js question on the parts inside the engine. trying to show him they are good parts.

the engine was not Slaped together and let it ride. lmfao. come on guys you know better then that. Plastigauge thats ok for a guy in his liveing room. useing a dial bore gauge to check oil clearances is the proper way to set those up.

and yes it was assembled right and everything was checked.


i love how ppl Jump in and think they know what happened to a engine and have no real data on it. and this goes for almost everyone. they Jump at a chance to Crap on any shop. be it SSM,RPM,Delk,Dynospeed,Speedydyno. i mean i can continue but why. and i am not just talking about ppl here i am talkking about the Web know it alls. it will drive a man crazy.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!
First over 500RWHP
First over 600RWHP
95 C4 single port
Turbo Dyno #s 550rwhp and 503rwtq. (pump gas)24psi(track only)
667rwhp and 648rwtq 30psi race gas.

race gas Time - 9.76@139.13mph
1/8th-6.24@113mph
60ft-1.50

N/A-best:60ft-1.69
1/8th mile-8.40@80.57mph
1/4 mile-13.30@98.60mph

dyno#s 226 rwhp@ 4800rpm
284 rwtq@ 4000rpm

Sponsor:
WWW.Delkperformance.com
matthewneuharth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 12:27 PM   #40
slvr2000stang
Mythical Mustang Owner
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 20,191
Send a message via AIM to slvr2000stang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewneuharth View Post
if there was any confusion. i am sorry. i was just answering Js question on the parts inside the engine. trying to show him they are good parts.

the engine was not Slaped together and let it ride. lmfao. come on guys you know better then that. Plastigauge thats ok for a guy in his liveing room. useing a dial bore gauge to check oil clearances is the proper way to set those up.

and yes it was assembled right and everything was checked.


i love how ppl Jump in and think they know what happened to a engine and have no real data on it. and this goes for almost everyone. they Jump at a chance to Crap on any shop. be it SSM,RPM,Delk,Dynospeed,Speedydyno. i mean i can continue but why. and i am not just talking about ppl here i am talkking about the Web know it alls. it will drive a man crazy.

Not saying it was. Just commenting on the difference.
__________________
Project Phoenix will rise from the ashes And it will be known as Darth Vader
Thanks to:
David Youghn | Tom @ www.supersixmotorsports.com | Artie @ www.artsperformanceparts.com
George @ www.accufabracing.com
3.8 H/C/I 242 rwhp Custom 4.2 246 rwhp
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 01:24 PM   #41
Shinerstang
10 Second Member
 
Shinerstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greensburg, Kentucky
Posts: 678
Default

I was trying to keep it positive guys......

No matter what, there is something wrong with it, and they are going to fix it. I think that says alot about them. I know how they've beat their heads against the wall with this build from day one, and this is not your everyday driver. We don't know what has gone wrong, we can only guess at this time.

We all may be able to learn from what has taken place and where the failure lies. Isn't that how we've all learned of what works and what doesn't? I mean we're not V8 guys-that's too easy.......
__________________
'02 V6 Turbo 10.25@134.59
'01 V6 Nitrous 12.94@104.88
Shinerstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 02:02 PM   #42
_J_
Official Southern Race Sponsor
 
_J_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Posts: 9,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinerstang View Post
I was trying to keep it positive guys......

No matter what, there is something wrong with it, and they are going to fix it. I think that says alot about them. I know how they've beat their heads against the wall with this build from day one, and this is not your everyday driver. We don't know what has gone wrong, we can only guess at this time.

We all may be able to learn from what has taken place and where the failure lies. Isn't that how we've all learned of what works and what doesn't? I mean we're not V8 guys-that's too easy.......

that shows a good biz .. a biz that stand behind their work is a very good biz imo..
and x2 got to keep it positive and open so we all can understand whats been going on..
best to wait for the final results on what happen. the only way to know is to take the motor
apart and see what fail..

Last edited by _J_ : 11-03-2008 at 02:39 PM.
_J_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 02:16 PM   #43
slvr2000stang
Mythical Mustang Owner
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 20,191
Send a message via AIM to slvr2000stang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _J_ View Post
that shows a good biz .. a biz that stand behind their work is a very good biz imo..
and x2 go to keep it positive and open so we all can understand whats been going on..
best to with for the final results on what happen. the only way to know is to take the motor
apart and see what fail..
Man that's for sure. :rockon:
__________________
Project Phoenix will rise from the ashes And it will be known as Darth Vader
Thanks to:
David Youghn | Tom @ www.supersixmotorsports.com | Artie @ www.artsperformanceparts.com
George @ www.accufabracing.com
3.8 H/C/I 242 rwhp Custom 4.2 246 rwhp
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 02:44 PM   #44
GT-EATER
Senior Member
 
GT-EATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jackson Mississippi
Posts: 6,778
Send a message via AIM to GT-EATER
Default

Sorry to hear about the engine Tom .
__________________
660 RWHP 583 RWTQSAE (Best dyno)
641 RWHP 603 RWTQ SAE (final Dyno)
11.584@124.58 (old set up)
Sponsored by
WWW.SUPERSIXMOTORSPORTS.COM
http://www.v6challenge.com
First and only split port to break the 600 RWHP SAE.
GT-EATER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 02:55 PM   #45
Phil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 3,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewneuharth View Post
if there was any confusion. i am sorry. i was just answering Js question on the parts inside the engine. trying to show him they are good parts.

the engine was not Slaped together and let it ride. lmfao. come on guys you know better then that. Plastigauge thats ok for a guy in his liveing room. useing a dial bore gauge to check oil clearances is the proper way to set those up.

and yes it was assembled right and everything was checked.
Matt, I was not pointing a finger. I know that motor was not slapped together (just reiterating what was already posted). But, I believe that you guys will be able to diagnose the problem when you pull that motor apart. My questions were posted so Tom would have some things to ask about and things to check for when re-assembly begins.

As J posted, it is important to post what went wrong. That helps all of us high HP guys be on the alert when doing maintenance or trying to diagnose a strange noise.
__________________
00 Vert, built 4.3L w/4-bolt main caps, ½” head studs, Comp stud RRs, BHJ balancer, MSD-4 spark boost, 71mm TB, GT pumps, wiring upgrade, 8AN fuel line, 80# injectors, PI 3-clutch 2800 stall, built 4R70W, alum shaft w/strap, ProCharger D1, 18 psi, built 8.8, 3.73s, Cobra brakes, 17x9 5-spokes, Tubular K-member w/coilovers, TriLink suspension, MM Panhard, meth injection, GT hydrabrake, AEM wideband, 1 7/8" ceramic headers, 2.75" dual exhaust, highflow cats, 6 pt roll bar, 542 rwhp, 11.723 quarter
Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Navigation
Go Back   V6Power Messageboard > Technical > Personal Projects and Builds



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed by:Designed by: vbdesigns.devbdesigns.de